Assistant Professor, Shri Shivaji Law College, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Definition and Essentials of Torts.


I. Definition & Essentials of Tort.
I. Introduction.                                                                                              
               The word tort is of French origin and is equivalent of the English word wrong. It is derived from the Latin word tortum, which means twisted or crooked. It implies conduct that is twisted or crooked. Tort is commonly used to mean a breach of duty amounting to a civil wrong.
                A tort arises due to a person’s duty to others which is created by one law or the other. A person who commits a tort is known as a tortfeaser, or a wrongdoer. Where they are more than one, they are called joint tortfeaser. Their wrongdoing is called tortuous act and they are liable to be sued jointly and severally.
                The principle aim of the Law of tort is compensation for victims or their dependents. Grants of exemplary damages in certain cases will show that deterrence of wrong doers is also another aim of the law of tort.
                                                     Image result for Law of Torts png
II. Meaning of Tort:
At a general level, tort is concerned with allocation of responsibility for losses, which are bound to occur in society. Tort is a branch of law governing actions for damages for injuries to private legal rights of a person, say, right to property, right to personal security, right to reputation, etc.,
III. Definition.
          Salmond- It is a civil wrong for which the remedy is a common law action for unliquidated damages and which is not exclusively the breach of a trust or other merely equitable obligation.
          Winfield “Tortuous liability arises from the breach of a duty primarily fixed by law; this duty is towards persons generally and its breach is redressible by an action for unliquidated damages.”
          Fraser: A tort is an infringement of a legal right in rem of a private individual, giving a right of compensation of the suit of the injured party.
IV. Objectives of Law of Torts
           to determine the rights between parties to dispute
           to protect certain rights recognized by law
           to prevent the continuation or repetition of a harm
           to restore the property to its rightful owner

V. Essentials/ingredients/elements/components/ general conditions of tort.
     If the plaintiff wants to claim compensation, then he must prove all the essentials of the tort. Following are the essentials of tort which the plaintiff has to prove.
A. Wrongful Act
  To determine Liabilities in tort it must be proved that the act or omission done by the one person was a wrongful. The act or omission must be legally wrongful. Violation of moral, social & religious rights does not come under the category of torts.      
B. Legal Damage
Another essential element is wrongful act or omission committed by one person must result in legal damages to the other i.e. such act or omission resulted into violation of legal rights of another person.
The sum of money awarded by court to compensate damage is called damages. Damage means the loss or harm caused or presumed to be suffered by a person as a result of some wrongful act of another. Legal damage is not the same as actual damage. In other words legal damage means the loss which results from the violation of legal right.
The real significance of legal damage is illustrated by two maxims namely: Injuria sine damno and Damnum sine injuria

C. Legal Remedy –
 The law of torts is said to be a development of the maxim ‘ubi jus ibi remedium’ or ‘there is no wrong without a remedy’. If a man has a right, he must of necessity have a means to vindicate and maintain it and a remedy if he is injured in the exercise or enjoyment of it; and indeed it is a vain thing to imagine a right without remedy; want of right and want of remedy are reciprocal.
Where there is no legal remedy there is no wrong. But even so the absence of a remedy is evidence but is not conclusive that no right exists.
VI. Conclusion
            It is concluded that whenever by the wrongful act of one person another person’s legal right is violated, such another person can claim compensation. It means if the plaintiff wants to claim compensation he must prove all the essentials of tort.

Share:

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Copyright © Waseem I. Khan | Powered by Blogger
Design by SimpleWpThemes | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com