Assistant Professor, Shri Shivaji Law College, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Injuria Sine Damnum/ Damno


  Injuria Sine Damno

Injuria means violation of legal right
Sine means without or in absence of
Damnum means damage or loss physical or mental
          It means violation of a legal right without causing any harm, loss or damage to the plaintiff. There are two kinds of torts: firstly those torts which are actionable per se, i.e. actionable without the proof of any damage or loss. For instance, trespass to land, is actionable even though no damage has been caused as a result of the trespass.
         Secondly, the torts which are actionable only on the proof of some damage caused by an act. For successful actions the only thing which has to be proved is that the plaintiff’s legal right has been violated, i.e. there is injuria.

Case Laws on Injuria Sine Damnum

Ashby vs White 1703 -In this case the defendant, a reputed officer in a parliamentary election, wrongfully refused to take the vote of plaintiff, although the plaintiff did not suffer any loss by this refusal because the candidate for whom he wanted to vote won in spite of that. Holt, C.J said, - “every injuria imports damage though it does not cost the party one farthing”. So the defendant was held liable to pay damages to plaintiff.                                                                                                                                   Bhim Singh vs State of J K AIR 1986 - Plaintiff was an MLA and was wrongfully arrested while going to assembly session. He was not produced before a magistrate within the requisite period.  It was held that this was the violation of his fundamental rights. Even though he was release later, he was awarded 50,000RS as exemplary damages by SC.
 Municipal Board of Agra v Ashrafi Lal (1921) 44 ALL 202. The defendant’s name was wrongly omitted  from the electoral roll and he was deprived of his right to vote. The lower court ruled in favor of defendant which was affirmed by High Court holding that the act of omission / refusal of returning officer is an infringement of defendant’s legal right to vote for which action lies against the person depriving him his right.

Share:

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Copyright © Waseem I. Khan | Powered by Blogger
Design by SimpleWpThemes | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com